Single-paragraph order rejecting a criminal application for modification of a bail suspension, holding it misconceived and not maintainable before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-APPLN15-18.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2018
David Kuche Prince ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Tushar Lavhate, for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI, J DATED: 11th JUNE, 2018
PC:-
1. The present application is for modification of the order passed while suspending the sentence and releasing the applicant on bail in Appeal is misconceived and is not maintainable before this Court. The application is accordingly rejected.
[A. S. GADKARI, J.]
1/1
Santosh David Kuche Prince
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court