Application dismissed for default due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution by the applicant.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution and non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-appln29.18.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2018
Badruddin Ansari @ Pappu Seth
…..Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents.
None for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rushit Thakkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 8th JUNE, 2018.
P.C.:-
None appears for the Applicant. Dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Badruddin Ansari @ Pappu Seth
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
