Confirmed interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant, finding no material against complicity in forgery and noting the other charge under PITA is bailable.
Interim relief of anticipatory bail on 17th January, 2018, is confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-ABA37-18.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2018
Rudramani Shrishil Hiremath ...Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. P. G. Sarda, i/b K. B. Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI, J DATED: 11th JUNE, 2018
PC:-
1. By an order dated 17th January, 2018 the Applicant was granted interim relief.
Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP. Perused the record.
2. The Investigating Officer Shri. Satyavan Tukaram Patil has filed Affidavit dated 31st January, 2018. As per the said Affidavit, till today there is no material available against the Applicant showing his complicity in forging or in manufacturing bogus AADHAR Card of co-accused, Miss. Santoshani K. Shahu. The other offence lodged against the
1/2
9-ABA37-18.DOC
applicant is under Section 4 of the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act (“PITA”, for short), which is a bailable offence.
17th January, 2018, is hereby confirmed.
3. Application is allowed in aforesaid terms.
[A. S. GADKARI, J.]
2/2
Rudramani Shrishil Hiremath
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court