A Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissed Criminal Application No. 28 of 2018 because the applicant was absent and failed to appear for prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-appln28.18.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2018
Badruddin Ansari @ Pappu Seth
…..Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
….Respondents.
None for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rushit Thakkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 8th JUNE, 2018.
P.C.:-
None appears for the Applicant. Dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Badruddin Ansari @ Pappu Seth
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
