Balaprasad Kanoba Pawar v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear on the date fixed for hearing after previous notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 558 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No. 558 of 2008
Balaprasad Kanoba Pawar.
.. Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. V.M. Kagne, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Coram: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. Date : 23 AUGUST 2017
ORDER:
When this matter was on board on 14 June 2017 none appeared for the petitioner. It was made clear that if nobody turns up for the petitioner on the next date the matter would be dismissed. None appeared for the petitioner today when the matter was called out. Writ Petition No.558/2008 is accordingly dismissed for default. Rule is discharged.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
rsl
Balaprasad Kanoba Pawar
State of Maharashtra
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court