This petition was dismissed for default after the petitioners failed to appear when called on the scheduled dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 176 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No. 176 of 2008
Pandharinath S/o. Rengunthwar @ Dr. R.P. Nath & Another.
.. Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. V.M. Kagne, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Coram: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. Date : 23 AUGUST 2017
ORDER:
When this matter was on board on 12 June 2017 none appeared for the petitioners. It was made clear that if nobody turns up for the petitioners on the next date the matter would be dismissed. None appeared for the petitioners today when the matter was called out. Writ Petition No.176 of 2008 is accordingly dismissed for default. Rule is discharged.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
rsl
Pandharinath S/o. Rengunthwar
Another
The State of Maharashtra
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
