A single paragraph oral order allowing Writ Petition No.2710/2006 based on precedents established in Writ Petition No.776/2006 and No.793/2006.
Writ Petition allowed in terms of prayer clause (B); rule made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Writ Petition No.2710/2006
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2710 OF 2006
Shradhanand s/o Vijaysingh Mane ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
... RESPONDENTS
Shri Hiraji Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.M. Kagne, A.G.P. for R.No.1 to 4 & 7/ State
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATED: 22nd August, 2017.
ORAL ORDER
Writ Petition No.2710/2006
2
and in Writ Petition No.793/2006, Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Rule is made absolute in aforesaid
terms. No order as to costs.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
Shradhanand s/o Vijaysingh Mane
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
