Anil Laxman Joshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 394 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No. 394 of 2008
Anil s/o Laxman Joshi. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. A.R. Borulkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Coram: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Date : 23 AUGUST 2017
ORDER:
The petitioner is already expired. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time on the last date on the ground that legal representatives of the petitioner want to prosecute the matter. Legal heirs of the petitioner are not brought on record till date. It is made clear that if steps are not taken by the legal representatives of the petitioner to implead themselves as petitioners in place of the original petitioner within two weeks from today, the petition would stand dismissed without further reference to Court. Place the matter on daily board for direction on 6 September 2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil s/o Laxman Joshi
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.D. DHANUKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court