The court dismissed the review petition, holding it was an appeal in disguise with no error apparent on the face of record. The associated civil application was also disposed of.
The review petition is dismissed and the Civil Application (St) No. 9084 of 2017 is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
dssherla
903-rpwst-9083-17 @ caost-9084-17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 9083 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 9084 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7640 OF 2015
The Security Association of India .. Petitioner V/s.
Union of India, through the Ministry of Home Affairs and ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. K.P. Anil Kumar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sandesh Patil a/w. A.R. Varma for the Respondent - Union of India.
Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondent No.2 – State. Mr. P.M. Palshikar for Respondent N0.3.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2017.
P.C.
1 of 2
2
dssherla
903-rpwst-9083-17 @ caost-9084-17
( CHIEF JUSTICE)
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition can be treated as an appeal to re-argue the matter when no error is apparent on the face of record.
The Security Association of India
Union of India
State
Manjula Chellur
M.S.Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
