Sunil M Mehta v. State Bank of Mysore
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the review petition and notice of motion for non-prosecution as the petitioner and counsel were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-rpwl.2.2017a.w.nmw.353.2017.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.2 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2288 OF 2014 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.353 OF 2017 IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.2 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2288 OF 2014
Sunil M. Mehta ...Petitioner Versus State Bank of Mysore ...Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 13th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
6-rpwl.2.2017a.w.nmw.353.2017.doc
2/2
does not survive and the same is also disposed of.
M. S. SONAK, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Sunil M. Mehta
State Bank of Mysore
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court