The High Court held that no grounds were made out for reviewing the impugned order. The review petition filed in Public Interest Litigation No.123 of 2014 was dismissed. No substantive orders or legal pronouncements were issued beyond the dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-rppl.9.2016.doc
1/1
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.9 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.123 OF 2014
Khan Mehboob ...Petitioner Versus The Collector of Bombay City and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Y.P.Narvankar, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Sharique Nachan, i/b Judicare Law Associates, for the Respondent No.2.
Mr.Dushyant Kumar, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1 and 4 to 6.
Ms.A.M.Sarfare, i/b Mr.Charanjeet Chanderpal, for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. &
M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 13th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
M. S. SONAK, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Khan Mehboob
The Collector of Bombay City
Respondents, Ors.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
