A PIL was filed to quash a Government Resolution providing agricultural loans of Rs. 10,000/- to farmers. The Court held that entertaining the petition was not appropriate based on surmises and apprehensions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vikrant 1/2 11-PILL-16602-17.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 16602 OF 2017
Smt. Kalpana Rangnath Inamdar ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. Hamid Kadiani i/b. Ms. Shilpa Madki for the Petitioner. Mr. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 20th July 2017.
P.C. :
vikrant 2/2 11-PILL-16602-17.sxw
or such any other four wheeler, will not be entitled to seek loan, will practically make genuine persons not getting the benefit of the loan.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Public Interest Litigation can be entertained on the ground that conditions in a Government Resolution for agricultural loans are arbitrary and may practically exclude genuine applicants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kalpana Rangnath Inamdar
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Dr. Manjula Chellur
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
