Petitioner filed P.I.L. alleging liquor shop in Mhasawad village causes nuisance. Court directed Collector of Jalgaon to treat the petition as a representation under law and decide within four weeks.
Direction to Collector of Jalgaon to treat petition as representation and decide it within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL - 62-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 62 OF 2017
Ganesh Shataram Aamle .. Petitioner
VS.
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. B.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 17-07-2017
ORAL ORDER :
to transfer their country liquor shop / permit room / beer bar and to close it down. The shop is in Mhasawad village, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon.
2 PIL - 62-2017
we direct the Collector, District – Jalgaon, to treat this Petition as a Representation of the petitioner / villagers and decide it in accordance with law.
consideration of the petitioner's grievance.
[MANGESH S. PATIL] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Collector should treat the PIL complaint of liquor shop nuisance as a representation and decide it.
Ganesh Shataram Aamle
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
