Disposed
Siddharth Chabu Khandagale v. the State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/95/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-pil-95-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 95 OF 2015
Siddharth Chabu Khandagale …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
MR. Rakesh Agrawal a/w Mr. Raju Mohan Thakkar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav M. Parashurami, for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Mr. Roop M. Vasudeo a/w Ms. Dipali Ganpat Mainkar, for the Respondent No.7.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 21 July 2017
ORDER :
Petition No.2476/2015 and Writ Petition (L) No.1130/2017
dated 19th July 2017, the grievance of the Petitioner no more
Devendra 1 / 2
901-pil-95-2015.doc
survives.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[B.R. GAVAI, J.]
2 / 2
Siddharth Chabu Khandagale
The State of Maharashtra
Riyaz I. Chagla
B.R. Gvai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court