This order disposes of PIL No. 11 of 2008, referring to a prior order dated 4th February 2009. The court grants the petitioner liberty to revive the petition based on the future decision of the Apex Court on the similar issue.
Liberty reserved to the petitioner to revive the petition depending upon the decision of the Apex Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 11.08-pil.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 11 OF 2008
| Gyan Prakash. V/s. |
... | Petitioner. |
|---|---|---|
| Bajaj Auto Ltd. and others. | ... | Respondents. |
None for the petitioner. Vishnu Peri i/b. Dhru & Co. for respondent No.1. Ms.Divya Sharma i/b. Mrs.Shiraz Patodia for respondent No.9 Amol B. Desai with Avinash K. Jalisatgi for respondent No.17.
CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 21st July 2017.
P.C. :
We have perused the order dated 4th February 2009.
The petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to revive the same depending upon the decision of the Apex Court on similar issue which is referred in the order dated 4th February 2009.
Gyan Prakash
Bajaj Auto Ltd.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
