PIL disposed of upon acceptance of an undertaking by the police to conclude the inquiry by 30.09.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
926 pil 96.15
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
926 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 96 OF 2015 WITH CA/16536/2016 IN PIL/96/2015
HINDU JANJAGRUTI SAMITI REGISTERED PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST ASHOK DEVIDASRAO KULKA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni Suresh M. GP for Respondents: Mr. A.B. Girase Advocate for Respondents : Mr. N.B. Khandare for R/5.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 14.07.2017.
P.C. :-
. The Deputy Inspector General of Police was present on the earlier occasion and he gave an undertaking to this Court to conclude the inquiry as expeditiously as possible.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
mub
HINDU JANJAGRUTI SAMITI REGISTERED PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST ASHOK DEVIDASRAO KULKA
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
