In PIL No. 54 of 2014, the court disposed of the proceedings since the respondent Municipal Corporation assured it would look into the petitioner's grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-PIL.54.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 54 OF 2014
Mrs. Charusheela Y. Patel } Petitioner versus The Pube Municipal } Corporation and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Sandesh Shukla i/b. M/s. Abhay Nevagi and Associates for the petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade-AGP for State.
Mr. A. P. Kulkarni for the Municipal Corporation.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & N.M.JAMDAR, J.
DATE :- JULY 13, 2017
P.C. :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance expressed in the petition is accepted and the Pune Municipal Corporation has assured that they will look into the matter and do the needful. Therefore, the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter further. Accordingly, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.
(N. M. JAMDAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,P.S.
Mrs. Charusheela Y. Patel
The Pune Municipal Corporation
Dr. Manjula Chellur
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
