Writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn upon application by the petitioners' counsel.
Leave to withdraw the writ petitions was granted; the petitions were disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP - 6886-2017+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6886 OF 2017
Dattatraya S/o Ramchandram Burra @ Burrawars and others .. Petitioners
VS.
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 6890 OF 2017
Manohar Ramchandram Burra .. Petitioner
VS.
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. A.R. Rathod, Advocate for the petitioners in both WPs Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State in both WPs
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 17-07-2017
ORAL ORDER :
1. On instructions from the petitioners, learned Advocate for
the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw these Writ Petitions.
2 WP - 6886-2017+
[MANGESH S. PATIL] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
Dattatraya S/o Ramchandram Burra
Manohar Ramchandram Burra
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
