Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

M/S Wasudeo Narayan Thosar, through… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

Home
Bombay HC
2017
M/S Wasudeo Narayan Thosar, through Proprietor, ShriM/S Wasudeo Narayan Thosar, through Proprietor, Shri Mukesh

Allowed

M/S Wasudeo Narayan Thosar, through Proprietor, Shri Mukesh Wasudeorao Thosar v. the State of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary for the Ministry of Co-Operation, Marketing and Textile and 4

Bombay HC24 Apr 2017CAW/989/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed a civil application permitting the petitioner to amend the underlying writ petition accordingly, dismissing a claim for costs.

What did the court decide?

Permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application. No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application. No costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner was entitled to amend the writ petition as prayed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Application allowed permitting amendment of Writ Petition. The application was allowed, the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed, and no costs were awarded to the respondents.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

1 caw989.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 989 OF 2017 IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 7211 OF 2016

(M/S. WASUDEO NARAYAN THOSAR....VS.. THE STATE OF MAH. & OTH.)

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

Court's or Judge's orders

Shri G.R.Sadar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri S.P.Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : APRIL 24, 2017.

For the reasons stated in the application, the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application.

The civil application is allowed accordingly. No

costs.

JUDGE

RRaut ..

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the petitioner was entitled to amend the writ petition as prayed.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/S. WASUDEO NARAYAN THOSAR
respondent
THE STATE OF MAH.

Coram

AI extract

Z.A.HAQ

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 24 Apr 2017 · April
Registered: 21 Apr 2017
Case no.: CAW/989/2017
CNR: HCBM040091982017
Topic: Civil Procedure and Limitation
Bench: Z.a. Haq
Disposal: Admitted/Allwd/Granted/Rule Absolute

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Z.a. Haq

Lokmat Media Private Limited Thr Its Sr. Manager Legal Syed Arshad Ali S/O Mustaq Ali Vs Ramesh S/O. Parasram Pethe and Another
21 Apr 2017
Devidas S/O Keshav Sonule and Ors. Vs the State of Mah. Dept. of Higher and Technical Edun. Thr. Its Secty. and Ors.
21 Apr 2017
Narendra P. Belchede Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secrtary, Education Youth Services and Employment Dept. Mumbai,or
21 Apr 2017
Jeetendra S/O Kisanrao Gulhane Vs Smt. Vimal Allies Sulochana Wd/O. Onkarsa Gulhane and Another
24 Apr 2017
Umesh S/O Rajnarayan Dube and Another Vs Rajnarayan S/O Sabhapat Dube
24 Apr 2017
Smt. Sangeeta Wd/O Prakash Gajbhiye and Another Vs Smt. Jaimala W/O Ashok Thaore
24 Apr 2017

Cite this judgement

M/S Wasudeo Narayan Thosar, through Proprietor, Shri Mukesh Wasudeorao Thosar v. the State of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary for the Ministry of Co-Operation, Marketing and Textile and 4, CAW/989/2017 (BOM), decided on 24 April 2017.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Z.A.HAQ

Parties & counsel