Lokmat Media Private Limited Thr Its Sr. Manager Legal Syed Arshad Ali S/O Mustaq Ali Vs Ramesh S/O. Parasram Pethe and Another

¶1

1 cao126.17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.126 OF 2017 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 1305 OF 2017 IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.7408 OF 2016 (REJ. W.P. NO.507 OF 2016)

¶5

(Lokmat Media Private Limited ..vs.. Ramesh s/o Parasram Pethe and another)

¶6

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Court's or Judge's orders

¶9

¶10

Shri S. Ghatole, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Ms. S.Z. Haider, A.G.P. for the respondent No.2.

¶11

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J. DATED : 21-04-2017

¶12

As the registration of writ petition is refused for not removing the office objections, without issuing notice to the respondent No.1 and accepting the explanation given in the application and the miscellaneous civil application, the delay of 198 days in filing the miscellaneous civil application is condoned, order passed by the learned Registrar on 18-07-2016 is set aside and the writ petition is restored.

¶13

The civil application and the miscellaneous civil application are allowed. No costs.

¶14

Writ Petition (Stamp) No.7408/2016 (Rej. Writ Petition No.507/2016 .

¶15

If the office objections are not removed within four weeks, the petition shall stand dismissed without reference to Court with costs quantified at Rs.1,000/-

¶16

2 cao126.17

¶17

(Rs. One Thousand Only) to be deposited by the petitioner with the High Court Legal Services SubCommitted, Nagpur.

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

adgokar

Lokmat Media Private Limited Thr Its Sr. Manager Legal Syed Arshad Ali S/O Mustaq Ali v. Ramesh S/O. Parasram Pethe and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokmat Media Private Limited Thr Its Sr. Manager Legal Syed Arshad Ali S/O Mustaq Ali v. Ramesh S/O. Parasram Pethe and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archana W/O Sharad Nasery Vs v. G. Ramteke (Since Deceased) through Lrs. Vishakha Dharampal Ramteke and Others

The Principal, Shri Niketan Arts and Commerce College, Nagpur and Another Vs the Joint Director, Higher Education Nagpur Division, Nagpur and Another

Pramod Bansilal Sharma and Anr. Vs Manohar S/O Kisanuji Dekate and Anr.

Sau. Jyotsana Ravindra Jadhao and Others Vs the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Devidas S/O Keshav Sonule and Ors. Vs the State of Mah. Dept. of Higher and Technical Edun. Thr. Its Secty. and Ors.

Narendra P. Belchede Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secrtary, Education Youth Services and Employment Dept. Mumbai,or