The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench dismissed an application seeking modification of a stay order due to lack of bonafides and failure by appellants to prosecute the civil application for 14 months.
No relief; application modified for stay order rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 sa67.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
SECOND APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2015
(UMESH RAJNARAYAN DUBE & ANR....VS.. RAJNARAYAN SABHAPAT DUBE)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Dr. R.S.Sirpurkar, Advocate for Appellants. Shri A.V.Bhide, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : APRIL 24, 2017.
CAS NO. 182/2016.
Heard.
The appellants have filed this application praying for modification of the order passed by this Court on 30th September, 2015, by which the appellants are directed to deposit Rs.3,000/- per month before Civil Court at Khamgaon every month as condition for grant of stay to the execution of the impugned decree. The amount is to be paid to the respondent who is father of the appellant No.1.
Considering the facts of the case and as I find that there are no bonafides on the part of the appellants in moving this application as they failed to prosecute this application for last 14 months, the civil application is rejected . No costs.
CAS NO. 181 OF 2016 .
List the civil application before the appropriate
Bench.
JUDGE
RRaut ..
Umesh Rajnarayan Dube & Anr.
Rajnarayan Sabhapat Dube
Z.A.Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
