The High Court at Nagpur allowed a civil application permitting the petitioner to amend the writ petition as prayed. The respondent's advocate did not dispute that the supporting documents were on record of the trial Court.
Petitioner permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caw881.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 881 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3877 OF 2016
(JEETENDRA KISANRAO GULHANE....VS.. VIMAL @ SULOCHANA ONKARSA GULHANE & ANR.)
Shri P.S.Raut, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri U.J.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : APRIL 24, 2017.
The learned advocate for the respondent No.2 does not dispute that the documents which are sought to be filed along with the amendment application are on record of the trial Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application.
The civil application is allowed accordingly. No
costs.
JUDGE
RRaut ..
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed in the application.
JEETENDRA KISANRAO GULHANE
VIMAL @ SULOCHANA ONKARSA GULHANE
Z.A.HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
