In a criminal application for condonation of delay, the Bombay High Court condoned the delay in filing an appeal against conviction and sentence to ensure justice, allowing the application.
Delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 315 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 176 OF 2017
Ibrahim @ Ibbu Aminuddin Shaikh .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan - Advocate appointed for the Applicant.
Mr. H.J.Dedia, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. 07th APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
caused in filing the Appeal against the conviction and sentence.
In view of the averments made in the application and in the
interest of justice, we are of the view that delay deserves to be
condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1/1
Ibrahim @ Ibbu Aminuddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
M.S.Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
