Khurshid @ Mullani Harun Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant, convicted under Section 302 and Section 149 of IPC, filed a bail application asserting that his old mother and younger sister have no one to look after. The court held that no new grounds were urged and rejected the application for bail.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected on the grounds that no new grounds were urged and previous applications were rejected on merits.
What the court decided
jdk 1 10.cr.appa.437.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 437 OF 2017 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2011
Khurshid @ Mullani Harun Shaikh
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan Advocate appointed for the applicant Mrs. G.P.Mulekar A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 06, 2017
ORAL ORDER: [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a convicted accused seeking it on the ground that there is no one to look after his old mother and younger sister.
Whether any new statutory grounds for granting bail exist in the present bail applications.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Khurshid @ Mullani Harun Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
V.K. Tahilramani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court