The High Court rejected the bail application of Chhabu Rajbhar, convicted under sections 376(2) and 305 IPC, holding that the lapse of one and a half years since his earlier bail application was rejected did not constitute sufficient fresh ground for reconsideration.
Bail application rejected with no fresh grounds provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 163 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 631 OF 2015
Chhabu @ Sanjay Fulchand Rajbhar .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Shyam B. Rajbhar, for the Applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
07th APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
(2) of IPC and section 305 of IPC. The applicant has committed
rape on 17/06/2012 and victim girl who was only 12 years of age got disturbed on account of the said incident and set herself on fire due to which she expired. The applicant is now seeking bail.
1/2
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a rape case where nearly one and a half years have elapsed since the earlier bail application was rejected.
Chhabu @ Sanjay Fulchand Rajbhar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
M.S.Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
