committed suicide because of harassment and torture of the non-applicants / respondents. The accused No.1 is husband of deceased Renu, accused No.2 is brother of accused No.1, accused No.3 is father of accused No.1, accused No.4 is mother of accused No.1 and accused No.5 is married sister of accused No.1. The case of the prosecution is substantially based on a note of deceased Renu and on the evidence of P.W. 2 Avdhesh Singh, P.W.3 Aritma Singh, P.W.4 Sughar Meshram and P.W.5 Shital Singh. The learned Addl. P.P. has submitted that Sessions Court has not properly appreciated the evidence on record and has wrongly acquitted the accused. The learned Advocate for the non-applicants / respondents has pointed out paragraph Nos.26 and 27 of the impugned judgment which show that the evidence on record is exhaustively considered by the Sessions Court and it is found that there are omissions, contradictions and improvements in the testimonies of the above referred witnesses. The learned Addl. P.P. has not been able to point out that there is any error in the appreciation of evidence by the Sessions Court.
