Allowed

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur

Bombay HC5 Jun 2017ABA/528/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a pre-arrest bail application in a case involving cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust. The interim protection granted earlier was confirmed on modified conditions requiring a bond and cooperation until the chargesheet was filed. Pending investigation status changed to ready chargesheet.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 20,000 with two solvent sureties of the like amount, subject to cooperation with investigation and regular attendance in court.

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni Vs the State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 aba528.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRI. APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 528 OF 2016

¶4

(PANKAJ RAVISHANKER SONI...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. P.S.O. GITTIKHADAN, NAGPUR)

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Shri H.I. Kothari, Advocate for applicant. Shri S.P.Deshpande, A.P.P. for Non-applicant.

¶8

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : JUNE 05, 2017.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

By this application, the applicant has sought prearrest bail in the crime registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 467 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This Court has passed order on 18^th August, 2016 granting interim protection to the applicant.

¶11

The non-applicant has filed reply on affidavit on 3^rd October, 2016. There is no complaint by the nonapplicant that the applicant has misused the protection granted by this Court. The learned A.P.P. has submitted that the investigation is complete, chargesheet is ready and it will be filed within two weeks.

¶12

The applicant has stated in paragraph 15 of the application that there are no past antecedents showing involvement of the applicant in any other crime/ offence.

¶13

Considering the facts of the case, in my view, the interim protection granted by this Court by the order passed

¶14

2 aba528.16

¶15

on 18^th August, 2016 is required to be confirmed, however, on modified conditions:

¶16

In the event of arrest in Crime No. 25 of 2016, registered by Police Station, Gittikhadan, Nagpur, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.Twenty Thousand with two solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶17

The applicant shall co-operate with the investigating agency till filing of the chargesheet.

¶18

After filing of the chargesheet the applicant shall attend the proceedings before the Court regularly on every date unless granted exemption by the Court.

¶19

The application is allowed in the above terms.

¶20

JUDGE

¶21

RRaut ..

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lions Education Society, through Its President, Washim Vs Presiding Officer, School Tribunal Amravati and 2 Others

Smt Durgabai Subhash Thakare and Others.. Vs Deepak Munna Umashankar Joshi and Another..

Empress Mills Karmachari Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., Nagpur through Its Secty., Sarang S/O T. Waghmare Vs Shri v. S. Parmar and Others

Mangesh S/O. Dashrath Bawne Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Police Station Tah. and Dist. Chandrapur

Firoz Khan Usman Khan Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Ner Yavatmal

Pankaj S/O. Moreshwar Dikonwar (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Karanja( Ghadge) Wardha