Dismissed

Shekh Mubarak S/O. Shekh Hayat (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Sakkardhara Nagpur

Bombay HC6 Jun 2017BA/1118/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application filed by the applicant arrested for offences including murder and causing miscarriage, the court dismissed the prayer. The court directed the Sessions Court to conclude and dispose of the trial by 30th September 2017.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed. Trial directed to conclude by 30th September, 2017.

Shekh Mubarak S/O. Shekh Hayat (in Jail) Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 ba1118.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRI. APPLICATION (BA) NO.1118 OF 2016

¶4

(SHEKH MUBARAK SHEIKH HAYAT...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. P.S.O. SAKKARDARA, NAGPUR)

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Shri M.J.Khan, A.P.P. for non-applicant.

¶8

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : JUNE 06, 2017.

¶9

The applicant is arrested on 25^th May, 2015 in the crime registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

According to the investigating agency there was enmity between the applicant and the victim and because of it the applicant assaulted the victim by axe. It is submitted that the post mortem report shows 12 injuries on the body of the victim out of which some injuries are on vital parts of the body of the victim and one injury is on the throat of the victim. It is submitted that the cause of death is shown as 'cut throat with head injury'.

¶11

In the reply filed by the investigating agency it is pointed out that apart from the present crime four other crimes for the offences punishable under Sections 336, 337 of Indian Penal Code, Section 12 of the Bombay Gambling Act (now Maharashtra Gambling Act) Sections 324, 294, 506, 323 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code are registered against the applicant.

¶12

2 ba1118.16

¶13

Considering the above fact, I am not inclined to grant the prayer in this application. The application is dismissed.

¶14

As the applicant/ accused is in jail since 25^th May, 2015, the Sessions Court is directed to conclude and dispose the trial till 30^th September, 2017.

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

RRaut ..

Shekh Mubarak S/O. Shekh Hayat (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Sakkardhara Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shekh Mubarak S/O. Shekh Hayat (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Sakkardhara Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. of P.S. Badnera, Amravati

Devanand S/O Deorao Ninghot Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Murtizapur, Akola

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur

Amit S/O. Vinod Mehra Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Jaripatka Nagpur

Sau. Sandhya W/O. Ishwar Ambadare Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Bhandara

Karan Pannalal Brahmane Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Wani Yavatmal