Dismissed

Amit S/O. Vinod Mehra v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Jaripatka Nagpur

Bombay HC6 Jun 2017APPP/1656/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Nagpur Bench dismissed a bail application containing no bona fides due to significant inaction by the applicant and Investigating Officer post-interim relief. Linked derivative applications were declared infructuous and disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed. Interim protection vacated. Applicant warned; non-surrender will be noted. Linked applications disposed of.

Amit S/O. Vinod Mehra Vs State of Maharashtra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 aba704.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRI. APPLICATION (ABA) NO.704 OF 2016

¶4

(AMIT VINOD MEHRA...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. P.S.O. PS JARIPATKA, NAGPUR)

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Shri D.V.Chauhan, Advocate for applicant. Shri M.J.Khan, A.P.P. for non-applicant.

¶8

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

¶9

DATED : JUNE 06, 2017.

¶10

The applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in the crime registered against him along with three others for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 120B, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

This application is filed on 24^th October, 2016 and was listed before the Court on the next day i.e. 25^th October, 2016 on which date this Court directed issuance of notice to the non-applicant/ State of Maharashtra and granted interim protection to the applicant.

¶12

The matter was listed on 16^th November, 2016 on which date it was adjourned on request of the learned A.P.P. to enable the non-applicant to file reply. It was directed that the matter be listed on 30^th November, 2016. Surprisingly, the matter is not listed thereafter.

¶13

The learned A.P.P. has opposed the application on the ground that out of four accused other two accused are arrested and fourth one is absconding.

¶14

2 aba704.16

¶15

Be that as it may, without delving into the merits, I find that there are no bonafides on the part of the applicant in prosecuting this application. As recorded earlier, the application was filed on 24^th October, 2016 and was immediately circulated on 25^th October, 2016 and when the applicant got interim order no steps are taken by him to get the application disposed though it was to be listed on 30^th November, 2016. It is relevant to record that the nonapplicant has filed its reply on 6^th December, 2016. There is lapse on the part of the Investigating Officer also. There is no explanation on behalf of the Investigating Officer as to why steps are not taken to get this application disposed of.

¶16

Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to grant prayer made in this application. The application is dismissed . The interim protection granted by this Court stands vacated.

¶17

If the applicant does not surrender within one week his conduct may be taken note of in all the further proceedings and at all stages.

¶18

CRI.APPLN.(APPP) NOs.1526/2016, 1656/2016 & 565/17.

¶19

In view of dismissal of the bail application, Criminal Application No.1526 of 2016 for grant of time to file certified copy of order and Criminal Application Nos.1656 of 2016 & 565 of 2017 seeking permission to assist the prosecution have become infructuous.

¶20

Hence, the criminal applications are disposed of.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

RRaut ..

Amit S/O. Vinod Mehra v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Jaripatka Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit S/O. Vinod Mehra v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Jaripatka Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. of P.S. Badnera, Amravati

Devanand S/O Deorao Ninghot Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Murtizapur, Akola

Pankaj S/O Ravishanker Soni Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur

Shekh Mubarak S/O. Shekh Hayat (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Sakkardhara Nagpur

Sau. Sandhya W/O. Ishwar Ambadare Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Bhandara

Karan Pannalal Brahmane Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Wani Yavatmal