Disposed

Karbhari Jaywantrao Tribhuwan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC7 Dec 2016WP/995/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought benefits under a 1989 Government Resolution regarding promotional scales. Court directed Management to forward the proposal and instructed authorities to decide within six months after hearing parties.

What did the court decide?

Management to forward proposal for Selection Grade pay scale; Education Officer to decide within six months after hearing parties.

Karbhari Jaywantrao Tribhuwan Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

08.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 995 OF 2015

¶4

KARBHARI JAYWANTRAO TRIBHUWAN

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

...

¶8

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. U. R. Awate i/by Talekar and

¶9

Associates

¶10

AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 State:Mrs. R. P. Gour
Advocate for Respondent No.4 :Mr. A. B. Gaikwad
Advocate for respondent No.5 : Mr. P. B. Gawali

¶11

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
 DATE:7th December, 2016

¶12

ORDER:

¶13

1. The petitioner seeks benefit of Government
Resolution dated 2nd September, 1989 claiming second

¶14

time bound promotional benefits applicable to 20% of
the members of the staff. According to Mr. Awate, the
petitioner is entitled for the benefit of the second
time bound promotional scale. It was allotted to one

¶15

Mr. Kolte erroneously because he was also promoted as
Headmaster in the year 2008. Learned counsel for the
respondent Institution submits that Mr. Kolte was
entitled for the benefit on 15.06.2005.

¶16

2. The Management may forward the proposal of the

¶17

petitioner for the benefit of the Selection Grade pay

¶18

scale as per the Government Resolution dated 2nd

¶19

1/2

¶20

December, 1989 (Exh.C).

¶21

3. The Institution/Management may put forth its
noting on the said proposal. The Education Officer
shall, thereafter, take decision upon the said proposal
after hearing the petitioner and the respondents
herein, expeditiously preferably within six months from
the date of receipt of the proposal. The proposal shall
be forwarded by the Management within one month from
today.

¶22

4. Writ petition disposed of. No costs.

¶23

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )

¶24

JPC

¶25

2/2

Karbhari Jaywantrao Tribhuwan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karbhari Jaywantrao Tribhuwan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Naim Abdul Rauf and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Namdeo Kisan Gaikwad and Another Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Shaikh Maulasab S/O Shaikh Mirasab and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babasaheb Thakaji Khaladkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Digambar Chandrabhan Aagre and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vijay Raman Choudhari Vs Sudhir U Meshram and Another