The High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 6004 of 2015. The petitioner withdrawn the petition and provided supporting communication, leading to the disposal of the matter without costs.
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
12 WRIT PETITION NO. 6004 OF 2015
BABASAHEB THAKAJI KHALADKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner :Mr. P. S. Dighe h/for Mr. Dhorde
Vikram R
AGP for Respondents State: Mrs. S. S. Raut
Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 & 6 : Mr. A. V. Hon
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:7th December, 2016
ORDER:
1. Mr. Dighe, the learned counsel for the
petitioner states that he is instructed to withdraw the
writ petition and has placed on record the copy of the
communication received by him. The same is marked ‘X’
for identification. In light of that, the writ
petition is disposed of as withdraw. No costs.
2. Needless to say that we have not dealt with any
issue on the merits of the matter.
JPC
1/1
BABASAHEB THAKAJI KHALADKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court