W.P.No.385/2011. This Court under order dated 8.10.2012, directed the Deputy Director of Education to take decision on the representation filed by the petitioners on 5.1.2010 after extending opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as the concerned Respondents. The learned counsel submits that if decision of the Deputy Director of Education is perused, the Deputy Director of Education has only recorded the contention of the parties and without assigning any reasons has disposed of the application of the petitioners. The learned counsel submits that the order of the Deputy Director of Education is not complying the orders of this Court in its true spirit passed in W.P.No.385/2011. When the petitioners had given specific instances about the illegal appointments of the teachers and also some members of the nonteaching staff, it was expected of the Deputy Director of Education to give finding on the allegations made by the petitioners. Serious allegations were made. The petitioners do not have any animosity with any staff member of the institution, however, because of the illegal appointments being made, the educational standard of the school is at its lowest ebb. According to the learned counsel, the President and the Secretary who were incharge have been ousted and the Head Master is exercising all the powers without adhering to the Rules, procedure and has made appointments as per his whims and free will. While making appointments, the procedure
