Writ petition seeking relief against a threat to seal a petrol pump. The court directed municipal respondents to examine documents and decide without taking coercive steps.
Respondents to examine petitioner's documents and decide within three weeks; no coercive steps against petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p19-wp-9430.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9430 OF 2016
M/s. Vashi Petroleum & Anr.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Pol i/by M/s. Pol Legal Juris for the petitioners. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondent No. 1 State. Mr. S.V. Marne for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2016.
P.C.
Not on board. Mentioned for urgent production. Production
granted in view of urgency.
2 p19-wp-9430.2016.sxw
Certificate and other documents) to justify the fact that the notice dated 5.8.2016 needs to be withdrawn. Be that as it may, we are of the view that the petition deserves to be disposed of by directing respondent nos. 2 and 3 to examine the petitioner's documents and thereafter take an appropriate decision on it in accordance with law. Till such decision is taken, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned notice dated 5.8.2016. The decision as aforesaid be taken within three weeks from today. Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Vashi Petroleum & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
