This court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous since the Senior Collector and Additional Commissioner had decided the matter. The interim order was vacated and the civil application was disposed of.
The writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. The interim order stands vacated. The Civil Application also stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
prod-7-caw-2192-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2192 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7263 OF 2016
Dhananjay Laxman Gonake ...Applicant In the matter between Mandabai Bhunadas Ghadge ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Tushar Sonawane, for the Applicant. Mr. Dushyant Pagare, for the Petitioner. Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 11, 2016
P.C.:
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
Additional Divisional Commissioner has decided the matter, in our considered view this Petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly the Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
prod-7-caw-2192-2016
be raised by the Petitioner in the Writ Petition which he has filed against the order of the Commissioner.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition rendered infructuous after the senior officer decided the matter.
Mandabai Bhunadas Ghadge
Dhananjay Laxman Gonake
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
