A short order extending time for production of documents in a civil application. The application is disposed of with the time extended by two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p8-caw-2195.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2195 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8788 OF 2013
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Saraswati Rajnikant Mayekar … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Respondents
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the applicant State.
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner.
Ms. Pooja Singh i/by N.R. Bubna for respondent no.3.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2016.
P.C.
Not on board. Mentioned for urgent production. Production granted in view of urgency.
The time fixed and extended on 29.6.2016 is extended by further period of two months from today. Civil Application is disposed of.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Saraswati Rajnikant Mayekar
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
