The High Court allowed Civil Application No. 4 of 2016, directing the necessary amendment in the Memo of Appeal within two weeks.
Amendment in the Memo of Appeal carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2016 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2000 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 284 OF 1986
Sadashiv Shenoy
since deceased through legal heirs I) Smt.Vasanti alias Vanita S.Shenoy and ors. .. Petitioners Vs.
Jagannath Seena Shetty .. Respondent
Ms.Nupur Awasthi i/b M/s.Consulta Juris, for the Petitioners. Ms.Sucheta Joshi -Dongre i/b Mr.Pankaj Thatte, for Respondent.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2016
P.C. :
. Heard parties through their Counsel on Civil
Application No. 4 of 2016. On due consideration, Civil Application is allowed. Necessary amendment in the Memo of Appeal be carried out within 2 weeks.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Sadashiv Shenoy since deceased through legal heirs
Jagannath Seena Shetty
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
