Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after revealing that the petitioner had been transferred on a mutual basis from Usmanabad to Thane as per letters issued by Zilla Parishad officials.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; order dated 8th September 2016 complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-wp-9151-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9151 OF 2015
Trupti Sitaram Kamthane ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another ...Respondents
Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, for the Petitioner Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for the RespondentState. Mr. S.P. Thorat, for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2016
P.C.:
Respondent No. 2 has placed on record a letter dated 2nd July, 2016
issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane as also letter dated 8th September, 2016 issued by Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Usmanabad. On going through the letter dated 8th September, 2016 it is revealed that the Petitioner as well as one Ram P. Wadikar has been transferred on mutual basis from Usmanabad to
Thane and from Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane to Tal. Umarga, Dist. Usmanabad respectively.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
903-wp-9151-2015
Petitioner has been redressed. As a result, we dispose of this Petition as having been rendered infructuous.
by all the concerned parties as expeditiously as possible.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding transfer has been redressed.
Whether the writ petition requires disposal as infructuous.
Trupti Sitaram Kamthane
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
