The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel requesting leave to withdraw, thereby also disposing of the accompanying civil application.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-caw-1668-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1668 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2604 OF 2009
Deepak Pundlik Jagtap and Another ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. V.K. Bodhare, for the Petitioner Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2016
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the Petition. The prayer is accepted. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a result, Civil Application is also stands disposed of.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Deepak Pundlik Jagtap
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
