Allowed

Shri. Vishwanath Ganpatrao Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Oct 2016WP/4469/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil application connected to a writ petition concerning service benefits for a deceased petitioner's legal representatives, the High Court of Bombay allowed the application and directed the respondents to release accrued monetary benefits expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release monetary benefits accrued in favour of the original petitioner to legal representatives as per entitlement expeditiously.

Shri. Vishwanath Ganpatrao Birajdar Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 CAW 2040-16.doc-P-17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2040 OF 2016

¶4

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.4469 OF 2014

¶6

Smt. Shridevi Vishwanath Birajdar and Anr. ] … Applicants In the matter of : Shri Vishwanath Ganpatrao Birajdar. ] … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ] … Respondents

¶7

Mr. V. K. Bodhare for Applicants. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for State. Mr. Ajay Joshi for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

¶8

CORAM :- SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & MAKARAND S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE :- OCTOBER 14, 2016

¶9

P. C. :-

¶10

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel for parties on Civil Application No.2040 of 2016. On due consideration, the application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶12

URS 1 of 2

¶13

2 CAW 2040-16.doc-P-17

¶14

Learned Counsel for applicants submits that the applicants who are newly added petitioners, are not intending to proceed with the matter as the reliefs claimed in the petition cannot be extended in their favour. In regard to service benefits payable to the deceased, learned counsel for applicants submits that the service benefits of the original petitioner have not been paid to the petitioners as yet.

¶15

Learned Counsel for management, in this regard, submits that the petitioners have to apply for the same, then the matter will be forwarded by the management to the State Government. To this, learned Counsel for applicants submits that the application to this effect has already been submitted.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid, while disposing of the petition, we expect that respondents shall release the monetary benefits accrued in favour of the original petitioner to his legal representatives as per their entitlement as expeditiously as possible.

¶17

With the aforesaid, Civil Application as well as the Writ Petition are disposed of.

¶18

(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)

¶19

(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

¶20

URS 2 of 2

Shri. Vishwanath Ganpatrao Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Vishwanath Ganpatrao Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Komalsing Navalsing Patil Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Ansari Salim Ahmed Khurshid Ahmed and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through School and Sports Division and Ors.

Shri. Limbaji Maruti Tapase Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Smt. Shridevi Vishwanath Birajdar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Krishna Tukaram Teli (Shelar) (Decd) through Lrs. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Addl. Chief Secretary and Ors.

Yashwant Rama Patil (Decd) through Lrs. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Addl. Chief Secretary and Ors.