The writ petition, filed seeking liberty to avail appropriate remedy, was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for the remedy sought in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 882 OF 2016
(Kaduba @ Ravindra s/o Sahebrao Devkar Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and others)
Mr. Kayyum N. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 4th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw this petition so
as to avail the appropriate remedy. Accordingly, the
writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn so as to avail
the appropriate remedy available in law.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criwp882-2016
Kaduba @ Ravindra s/o Sahebrao Devkar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court