The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed Criminal Application No. 3086 of 2016 as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. No substantive legal principles were articulated.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3086 OF 2016
(Sunil Jagannath Zalani and another Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and another)
Mr. R.F. Totala, Advocate for the applicants
Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 4th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned counsel for the applicants, on
instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the application
with further liberty to avail the appropriate remedy
available in law. The criminal application is dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criapln3086-2016
Sunil Jagannath Zalani
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court