Rajendra D. Shirke v. the Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram noted prior direction compliance and disposed the writ petition without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
(WPL 125 of 2016).
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) No. 125 OF 2016
Rajendra D. Shirke ….Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. …..Respondents
.
Mr. B.G. Ligade i/b. Drupad S. Patil for Petitioners Mr. J. Reis, Senior Counsel a/w. K.H. Mastarkar for Respondent - BMC Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande i/b. Kanga & Co. for Respondent No.4 Mr. Amit Shastri- AGP for Respondent No.5 ******
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. KARNIK , JJ.
DATE : MARCH 30, 2016
P.C. :
We are informed that the direction given by this Court on 24th
February, 2016 has been complied with and in view of this, no further orders
are necessary. Writ petition is disposed of.
V.M. KANADE, J.
M.S.KARNIK, J.
Rajendra D. Shirke
The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Ors.
V. M. KANADE
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court