PIL disposed of for want of prosecution as petitioner did not appear despite counsel's lack of instructions. All interim orders were vacated.
Vacatur of all interim orders; petition disposed of for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.8/2015(6)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 08 OF 2015
Nityanand Harnanrayan Mishra ...Petitioner Vs. Municipal Commissioner (BMC) & Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Nisha Mehra for the Petitioner Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Ms. I.K. Calcuttawala AGP for Respondent No.7 Mr. Birendra Saraf a/w. Mr. Rahul H. i/b. Hariani & Co., for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6
CORAM : V.M.KANADE &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2016
P.C. :
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
(V.M.KANADE, J.)
Nityanand Harnanrayan Mishra
Municipal Commissioner (BMC) & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
