Iqbal Mohammad Shaikh Vs Municipa Corporatin of Greater Mumbari and 2 Others

None appears on behalf of the petitioner. By this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs.

¶12

(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ under Article 226 of Constitution of India against the Respondent No.1 and 2 with a direction to initiate legal action against the Respondent no.3 in respect of work being carried out Room no.8, 4^th floor, 60, A1 Rameez Mansion, Sh. Burhan Qamruddin Street, Mumbai-400 008;

¶13

WP.2355 of 2015(28)

¶14

2

¶15

(b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant mandatory order and injunction against the Respondent no.1 and 2 directing them to remove the illegal construction carried out by the Respondent no.3 in Room no.8, 4^th floor, 60, A1 Rameez Mansion, Sh. Burhan Qamruddin Street, Mumbai-400 008;

¶16

(c ) Interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (b) above;

¶17

(d) Such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of this case;

¶18

(e) Costs of this petition.

¶19

In our view, the petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to treat this petition as a representation made by the petitioner and to decide the same on merits and in accordance with law after giving notice to respondent No.3 and to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 6 weeks. With these directions the petition is disposed of.

¶20

(V.M.KANADE, J.)

¶21

(M.S. KARNIK, J.)

Iqbal Mohammad Shaikh v. Municipa Corporatin of Greater Mumbari and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iqbal Mohammad Shaikh v. Municipa Corporatin of Greater Mumbari and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Jagson International Ltd. Vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

Esther Mary Dmello Vs the Municipal Corp. for Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Shri Govindbhai Pandya and Another Vs Shri Prashant Sakpale the Asstt. Commissioner and Anr.

Nityanand Harnarayan Mishra Vs Municipal Commissioner and 5 Ors.

Radhadevi Ramji Singh and 2 Others Vs the Administrator General and Official Trustee of Maharashtra

Rajaram Bhikaji Madhav and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.