Disposed

Shri. Nimbalkar Jaywant Gulabrao v. Shri Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha Bhavani Nagar, through Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Dec 2016WP/690/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court settled a dispute regarding non-payment of salary. It directed the petitioner to file a representation with the Education Officer, disclosing details and serving copies to Management, laying down a two-week timeline for Management's response and a 12-week timeline for the decision.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file representation before Education Officer; direction to Management to submit view; direction to Education Officer to decide within 12 weeks.

Shri. Nimbalkar Jaywant Gulabrao Vs Shri… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

26-wp-690.2014.sxw

hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 690 OF 2014

¶7

Shri Nimbalkar Jaywant Gulabrao

¶8

… Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

Shri Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha through its Secretary & Ors.

¶11

… Respondents

¶12

Mr. S.V. Pitre for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. V.S.Salunke for R.1 and 2.

¶14

Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent State.

¶15

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2016.

¶16

P.C.

¶17

Heard learned Counsel for both the sides. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

¶18

Within a period of two weeks from today, the petitioner

¶19

shall make application/representation to the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune making a grievance about non-payment of salary to the petitioner. The petitioner shall disclose all

¶20

26-wp-690.2014.sxw

¶21

particulars about his date of appointment, salary to which he is entitled to in accordance with law and payment that he has received so far in lieu of salary from the Management. The petitioner shall also place all the documents on which he proposes to rely in support of his case before the Education Officer. The petitioner before filing such application/representation before the Education Officer shall serve copy thereof on the Management. The Management within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving copy of such application/representation from the petitioner, shall submit its point of view before the Deputy Director.

¶22

All objections the Management may wish to raise can be raised by it, which shall be considered by the Education Officer and the Education Officer shall thereafter decide the claim of the petitioner for payment of salary by a reasoned order. It is made clear that if the Education Officer finds that the Management despite appointing the petitioner solemnly

¶23

has not been paying full salary consistently, then the Education Officer may consider whether any action for derecognizing the school of the Management can be taken.

¶24

3 26-wp-690.2014.sxw

¶25

The order shall be made by the Education Officer within a period of 12 weeks from the date on which reply of the Management is received or the time fixed for filing the reply by the Management is over. All contentions available to both sides are kept open. Similarly the remedies that may be available to both the sides against the order that may be passed by the Education Officer are also kept open.

¶26

With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶27

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

¶28

(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

Shri. Nimbalkar Jaywant Gulabrao v. Shri Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha Bhavani Nagar, through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Nimbalkar Jaywant Gulabrao v. Shri Chhatrapati Shikshan Sanstha Bhavani Nagar, through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Gopalrao Bapurao Bhamre Vs Zilla Parishad, Nashik and Otheres

Jagdish Daulat Mahale Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Mrs. Meera Borvarkar

Shri Gaikwad Sudhakar Nanasaheb and Ors. Vs Shri Ujival Uke and Ors.

Shri. Dhananjay Dadasaheb Jagtap Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Nandkishor Prakash Aher and Ors. Vs St. Zaviers Education Trust and Ors.

Shri. Jayprakash Narayan Deshmukh and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.