In WP 3529 of 2014, upon receipt of a communication and the petitioner's plea to withdraw with liberty, this Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
11-wp-3529.2014.sxw
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3529 OF 2014
Krishnali Resort Pvt. Ltd.
.. Petitioner
Versus
The Konkan Railway Corporation Limited
.. Respondents
Mr. Debashree Mandpe i/by Ganesh & Co. for the petitioner.
Ms. Kiran Bagalia for respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2016.
P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the communication dated 28.11.2016 received from Konkan Railway Corporation Limited. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
in view of the aforesaid communication, the petitioner has instructed her to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition, if need so arises. With the aforesaid liberty, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Krishnali Resort Pvt. Ltd.
The Konkan Railway Corporation Limited
Prakash D. Naik
Shantanu Kemkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
