Mohammed Hussain and 9 Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

¶1

1 of 2 WP.1017.2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.1017 OF 2015

¶4

Mohammed Hussain and others Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶5

Mr.S.K.Mali for Petitioners.

¶6

Mr.S.P.Thorat for Respondent nos.2 to 4. Mr.R.J.Mane, AGP for Respondents 1 and 6. Mr.Mayur Joshi i/by Joshi Legal Associates for Respondent no.5. Mr.Sagar Patil for MCGM.

¶7

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 30^th November 2016

¶8

PC :

¶9

Heard. It has been pointed out by learned counsel for Slum Rehabilitation Authority that the Petitioners have already approached the High Power Committee appointed by this Court, which has to consider and decide Petitioners' appeal. In the circumstances he submits that this petition deserves to be disposed of by directing High Power Committee to decide Petitioners' appeal.

¶10

Learned counsel for Petitioners submits that the appeal is pending before High Power Committee since 2012 but till date there is no progress in the matter. Keeping in view the aforesaid position, we are inclined to dispose of the petition by directing High Power

¶11

2 of 2 WP.1017.2015

¶12

Committee before whom Petitioners' appeal is pending, to consider said appeal as expeditiously as possible and not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶13

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶14

MST

Mohammed Hussain and 9 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Hussain and 9 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Dhondiba Ambadas Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bibhishan Pralhad Sherkhane Vs the Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune Division, Pune and Ors.

Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dr.Mrs. Manisha Prahlad Undre and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Department of Public Helath and Medical Education and Ors.

High Court on Is Own Motion Vs Mr. Tukaram Mundhe

Mrs. Salochana Surendrakumar Wadhwea and Anr. Vs Union of India, through Ministry of Defence and Ors.