High Court disposed of Contempt Petition No.309/2015 because the respondent filed a reply stating compliance with the impugned order had already been effected.
Disposed of the Contempt Petition based on admission of compliance by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-309-15.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.309 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1219 OF 2010
Dnyandeo Zuka Misal .. Petitioner V/s. Kaveri Banarji & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Prasanna Kishor i/b. Milind Desmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. A. Dube a/w. Mr. H.V. Mehta, Advocate for Respondent– UOI.
Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent–State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 1, 2016.
P.C. :
Heard parties through their counsel.
2 Perused the reply filed by respondent no.4 making a
statement that the order of which non-compliance alleged has
already been complied with. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by respondent no.4, we dispose of the Contempt Petition.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Dnyandeo Zuka Misal
Kaveri Banarji
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
