Court allowed a civil application to restore a writ petition dismissed for non-removal of office objections due to oversight and ordered removal within three weeks.
Restoration of WP (St) No. 30474 of 2014 on original number with office objections to be removed within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-caw-1965.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1965 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 30474 OF 2014
Rajenra Sabaji Nimbalkar
… Applicant
In the matter of :
Appaso Raosaheb Nimbalkar and Ors.
… Petitioners
Versus
The Divisional Commissioner and Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. D.S. Shinde for the petitioners.
Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2016.
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This application is for seeking restoration of the WP (St) No. 30474 of 2014 which suffered dismissal for non removal of office objections. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to oversight, office objections could not be removed within time fixed in the order dated 22.12.2015. Keeping in view the aforesaid, we allow the Civil Application and order restoration of WP (St) No. 30474 of 2014 on its original number. Let the office objections be
2 7-caw-1965.2016.sxw
now removed within three weeks. Civil Application stands disposed
of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Rajenra Sabaji Nimbalkar
Appaso Raosaheb Nimbalkar and Ors.
The Divisional Commissioner and Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
