Disposed
Mrs. Kaushalya Ramchand Dassani v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another
Bombay HCWP/2099/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-wp-2099-2014
WRIT PETITION NO.2099 OF 2014 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.403 OF 2015
Kausalya Ramchand Dassani
...Petitioner
vs.
Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Mr. J. Ansari, for the Petitioner Ms. K.H. Mastakar, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 12, 2016
P.C.:
of the reply affidavit clause 4(f) filed by Respondent-Municipal Corporation, this Petition may be disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2/Competent Authority to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner in regard to his submission to the averments made in the clause 4(f) of the said affidavit and the Petitioner may be permitted to file additional documents in support of his contention.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
909-wp-2099-2014
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Kausalya Ramchand Dassani
Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court